Latest version of Bidule

[dts350z]

Is .9752 an OSX patch release, or did I catch you in the middle of updating the downloads (I see only OSX versions of .9752)?

[seb@plogue]

It's for Sierra, vertical slider shows as horizontal for 9751 and below.

[boonier]

Speaking of which, did you have a change log for .9751/2?

[reezekeys]

Bumpety-bump!

[BiCho]

+1

Indeed, very useful

[AEK]

Hi,
The latest version of Bidule for Windows was released on 29 June. What caused the suspension of the further development of programs, and when to expect updates soon?
Andrey.

[dts350z]

I see .9753 on the main page but not in the usual spot:

http://www.plogue.com/bidule/latest/

Also no discrete version of .9753 (or maybe it's merged back into the main line?).

[seb@plogue]

I see .9753 on the main page but not in the usual spot:

http://www.plogue.com/bidule/latest/

Also no discrete version of .9753 (or maybe it's merged back into the main line?).

I've changed the page and uploaded the files when I made the release Tuesday, is it possible you are seeing a cached page?

[dts350z]

I see it now on my iPhone. I'm pretty sure I did a shift reload but the site was also timing out in chrome for me last night so maybe cached?

Anyway thanks for the change notes on .9753. Do those include the .9751 changes?

[AEK]

The fact that there is a new update - wonderful!
The only pity is that you are still not able to provide multi-channel operation in Flux Spat 3. It will wait for the next update ...

https://yadi.sk/i/ADXszG4q33epSA

[seb@plogue]

If you have the latest version of Spat3 installed, you will need to rescan the plugins to make the other i/o configs show
up since this is done when scanning the plugins.

[AEK]

Bravo! Now I see that everything is working properly. Very good.
By the way, I did not write about it before, but in this version Bidule the problem was resolved and multi-channel Altiverb 7 XL.

[nym]

oscextractor2 manual entry please!

[seb@plogue]

oscextractor2 manual entry please!

It's pretty much the "reverse" of OSC Creator 2

As is:
output the parameter as it comes in (evidently that only works for int/float)

Format string with float output:
returns the float part of a format string e.g.: str_%f will output 4.555 for str_4.555

Format string with int output:
returns the int part of a format string e.g. string%d will output 3 for string3

Index from string list:
will return the 0-based index of a matched string from a list e.g. string1;string2;string3;string4; will return 3 for string4

[boonier]

Thanks Seb

If someone could enlighten me as I'm failing to see it, but what does renaming multiple parameters serve to benefit? Draggable parameters though.....

EDIT -- OK I see why renaming multiple params is useful. I just used it!